Key Takeaways (TL;DR):
- Unlimited-user CMMS software allows authorized users to be added without an additional per-user software fee.
- MaintenanceCare is $250 per month with unlimited users, so adding authorized users does not add another user charge.
- Individual accounts can improve accountability, employee performance tracking and maintenance data quality compared with shared logins.
- As more people use a flat-rate unlimited-user CMMS, the effective cost per user decreases.
When organizations compare CMMS software, pricing is usually one of the first things they look at. But there is an important question hiding behind the monthly price:
How many people can actually use the software?
Many CMMS platforms charge by the user. That can make sense when only a few people need access, but maintenance rarely operates in isolation.
As more people need access, per-user software costs can grow with them. MaintenanceCare takes a different approach.
MaintenanceCare is $250 per month with unlimited users and no contracts.
That means organizations don't have to decide who gets a CMMS login based on the cost of another software seat. And as more people use the system, the effective cost per user goes down.
Unlimited-user CMMS software allows an organization to add authorized users without paying an additional software fee for each person.
Instead of purchasing another license every time a technician, manager or other department needs access, organizations can create individual accounts based on who actually needs to use the system.
Unlimited users can help organizations:
For organizations trying to make their CMMS a central part of operations, that's an important distinction.
One of the biggest benefits of unlimited users is also one of the simplest:
When software is priced per user, organizations may be tempted to limit the number of paid accounts. A team of technicians might share a generic maintenance login. Managers might rely on exported reports instead of having direct access. Occasional users may simply be left outside the system. That may reduce the number of software licenses, but it can create other problems.
When several employees know the same username and password, controlling access becomes more difficult. If an employee leaves the organization, security is compromised and the password will need to be changed and redistributed to everyone still using the account. With individual accounts, access can instead be managed at the individual-user level. If an employee leaves, their access can be removed without affecting everyone else's login.
A shared account also creates a major problem with maintenance data:
Who actually did the work?
If several technicians complete work orders using the same login, activity recorded under that account doesn't reliably identify the individual employee responsible for it. That makes it much harder to use CMMS data to understand individual performance.
With individual accounts, managers can get clearer visibility into information such as:
That creates a much stronger foundation for evaluating workloads, identifying bottlenecks and understanding employee performance.
The value of a CMMS depends heavily on the quality of the information going into it. If five employees share one login, the system may know that someone completed the work, but the data loses an important layer of detail. That can affect labor tracking, work histories, employee performance reporting and overall accountability. Unlimited users remove the licensing incentive to share accounts.
One employee. One account. Clearer accountability.
Software Advice's maintenance management buyer research found that $50 to $100 per user per month is the most common software budget among maintenance software buyers. That can add up quickly.
The challenge with per-user pricing isn't necessarily the initial software cost. It's what happens as adoption grows.
A maintenance team may start with a few technicians, but then a manager needs access. Another technician is hired. A second shift is added. Finance could benefit from seeing relevant information. IT wants to manage its own assets and workflows. Each new user can potentially mean another software charge.
What may initially look like a lower-cost option can become more expensive as additional users are added. If the budget doesn't grow along with the number of users, organizations may start limiting access or falling back on shared logins.
To see how user-based pricing can change as a maintenance team grows, here's a comparison using publicly available pricing from several CMMS providers. The plans below are not presented as feature-for-feature equivalents. The comparison simply illustrates how published per-user pricing can affect monthly software costs as more paid users are added.
| CMMS / Plan | Published Price | 3 Users | 5 Users | 10 Users | 20 Users | Published User Minimum |
| MaintenanceCare | $250/month | $250 | $250 | $250 | $250 | Unlimited users |
| Fiix Professional | $75/user/month | $225 | $375 | $750 | $1,500 | No published minimum |
| eMaint Professional | $85/user/month | $255 | $425 | $850 | $1,700 | 3 users |
| Limble Premium+ | $69/user/month* | $207 | $345 | $690 | $1,380 | No published minimum |
| UpKeep Premium | $55/user/month | $165 | $275 | $550 | $1,100 | No published minimum |
| MaintainX Premium | $65/user/month* | $195 | $325 | $650 | $1,300 | No published minimum |
| Maintenance Connection Professional | $110/user/month | $330 | $550 | $1,100 | $2,200 | 3 users |
Pricing based on publicly available vendor pricing as of October 2026 and shown in USD. Calculations illustrate subscription pricing at the listed number of paid users and do not account for taxes, implementation, add-ons, custom pricing, volume discounts or other fees. Plans are not necessarily equivalent in features. MaintainX Premium pricing shown is based on annual billing. MaintenanceCare's $250/month price is based on yearly pricing. Limble Premium+ has been publicly listed at $69/user/month, while its current pricing page directs buyers to calculate their price. Vendor pricing and plan terms may change.
The difference becomes more noticeable as the team grows. At three users, several of the per-user plans shown below have a lower monthly cost than MaintenanceCare. But as more paid users are added, those costs increase while MaintenanceCare remains at $250 per month.
At 10 users, the published monthly costs for the selected competitor plans range from $550 to $1,100, while MaintenanceCare remains $250 per month with unlimited users.
Monthly costs shown are based on the published pricing used in the comparison above. Plans are not necessarily feature-for-feature equivalents. Pricing and plan terms may change.
MaintenanceCare's unlimited-user model works differently. MaintenanceCare is $250 per month with unlimited users and no contracts.
Adding another authorized user doesn't add another user fee. That makes software costs more predictable as teams grow and allows organizations to expand access based on operational need rather than the cost of another seat.
Another way to look at unlimited-user pricing is to calculate the effective cost per user as more people use the system.
With MaintenanceCare's $250 monthly subscription, the total monthly user charge stays the same as authorized users are added. When that $250 is divided across more users, the effective cost per user decreases.
| Number of Users | Monthly Price | Effective Cost Per User |
| 3 | $250 | $83.33 |
| 5 | $250 | $50.00 |
| 10 | $250 | $25.00 |
| 20 | $250 | $12.50 |
| 30 | $250 | $8.33 |
| 50 | $250 | $5.00 |
Effective cost per user is calculated by dividing the $250 monthly subscription by the number of users. This illustrates the effect of user growth and does not represent individual user pricing.
At five users, the effective cost is $50 per user. At ten, it's $25. At twenty, it's $12.50. At fifty, it's $5.
The software becomes more cost-efficient per user as more people within the organization use it.
That's a very different growth model from software where every additional user adds another monthly charge. With per-user pricing, initial savings can quickly disappear as adoption grows. If Finance isn't willing to approve more paid seats, limiting access or sharing logins can become the fallback. With unlimited users, organizations don't face that same per-user cost pressure.
A CMMS may be called a Computerized Maintenance Management System, but maintenance information affects much more than the maintenance team. Software Advice's buyer research found that approximately 90% of maintenance software buyers prefer a single platform rather than managing maintenance through multiple separate tools.
Unlimited users can make broader adoption easier. Instead of asking whether another department is important enough to justify another paid software seat, organizations can consider a better question:
Would giving this person access make the maintenance process more efficient?
Finance teams can participate in relevant financial workflows and use CMMS information when producing invoices. Rather than relying entirely on information being exported and passed between departments, authorized Finance users can have direct access to the information they need. And because users are unlimited, Finance access doesn't require another paid seat.
IT can have its own maintenance workflows within the CMMS. An IT department may be responsible for a very different portfolio of assets than the facility maintenance team, including computers, printers, servers, networking equipment and other technology assets. Those assets can have their own work requests, histories and workflows. Unlimited users allow IT staff to participate without the organization having to purchase another seat for every person who needs access.
Maintenance requests often originate outside the maintenance department. Operations, housekeeping, administration and other teams may be the first people to notice that something needs attention. Giving the right people access can help move maintenance information into the CMMS rather than leaving it scattered across emails, spreadsheets, phone calls and conversations.
The goal isn't to give everyone access simply because you can. It's to remove user cost from the decision about who should participate.
Managers don't necessarily need to complete maintenance work themselves to benefit from CMMS access.
They need visibility.
With per-user pricing, adding managers can mean paying for additional software seats simply so they can monitor what's happening. With unlimited users, authorized managers can have their own accounts without creating another user charge.
That means managers don't have to rely solely on someone else producing and sending reports. They can access relevant information directly and get greater visibility into:
That direct visibility can help managers ask better questions and make decisions using the maintenance information already being collected. It also reinforces the value of individual employee accounts.
If technicians share logins, managers lose much of the ability to understand individual activity. If every technician has an individual account, the CMMS becomes much more useful as a management and employee performance tool.
There's an interesting contradiction with some per-user software models.
The more successful adoption becomes, the more expensive the software can become.
A company starts with five users. Then a manager wants access. Another technician is hired. Operations gets involved. Finance could benefit from the information. IT wants to manage its own workflows and assets.
Suddenly, an organization that started with five paid users may have 15 or 20 people who could benefit from access. With per-user pricing, successful adoption can increase the software bill. With unlimited users, increased adoption doesn't create the same per-seat cost pressure.
Instead, the organization can ask:
"Would giving this person access make our operation better?"
rather than:
"Do we want to pay for another seat?"
Broader participation can also make the information inside the CMMS more valuable.
As Joe Bilik, CEO & Founder of Bluebird Procurement, explains:
"I really see the opportunity of having Maintenance Care as our core repository for all things maintenance management... Having a repository of all assets, all contracts, all preventative maintenance schedules, all in one platform is a massive benefit. That visibility in and of itself to proactively manage their portfolio is a huge value."
When more of the right people participate in the system, maintenance information doesn't have to live in isolated spreadsheets, inboxes or individual departments.
The CMMS can become a central source of maintenance information across the organization.
Buying CMMS software doesn't automatically improve maintenance operations. People actually have to use it. If organizations restrict access because every additional user costs more money, they may also limit the amount and quality of information entering the system.
With unlimited users, technicians can maintain individual work histories, managers can monitor activity, Finance can participate in relevant workflows and IT can manage its own assets and work.
Other authorized departments can interact with maintenance processes where it makes sense. That can create a more complete picture of what's happening across the organization. It also makes the information inside the CMMS more attributable. Instead of activity disappearing behind a shared account, work can be associated with individual users.
Software Advice's CMMS best-practice guidance similarly emphasizes the importance of technicians consistently recording detailed information in work orders. The more complete and attributable the data, the more useful the CMMS can become for employee performance tracking, reporting, planning and decision-making.
Maintenance teams rarely stay exactly the same size. Employees leave. New technicians are hired. Managers change. Departments expand. Responsibilities shift.
With per-user software, those staffing changes can also affect the software bill. Unlimited users separate those two things.
Adding another authorized user doesn't create another user charge.
That can make budgeting easier because organizations don't have to forecast exactly how many individual software seats they may need as staffing changes. It also means there is no financial reason to remove a manager from the CMMS simply to free up a paid seat for somebody else. As adoption grows, the monthly user cost doesn't grow with it. Instead, the effective cost per user decreases. The organization can determine access based on operational needs rather than seat availability.
| Consideration | Per-User Pricing | Unlimited Users |
| Adding a technician | May increase monthly cost | No additional user charge |
| Adding a manager | May require another paid seat | No additional user charge |
| Individual employee accounts | Cost may influence how many accounts are created | Individual accounts can be created without additional user fees |
| Shared logins | May become a workaround for limiting seats | Less financial incentive to share accounts |
| Employee performance tracking | Shared accounts can reduce individual attribution | Individual accounts support clearer attribution |
| Adding Finance or IT | May require more paid seats | Authorized departments can be added without additional user charges |
| Growing teams | User licensing costs can increase | User cost remains flat |
| Effective cost per user | Typically stays tied to the per-user rate | Decreases as more users are added |
| Manager visibility | Additional managers may require paid licenses | Managers can receive individual access without another user charge |
| Contract commitment | Varies by vendor | MaintenanceCare has no contracts |
The real benefit of unlimited users isn't simply that you can create more accounts. It's that you don't have to ration access based on the cost of another seat.
MaintenanceCare gives organizations unlimited users for $250 per month with no contracts.
Your CMMS should become more valuable as more of your organization uses it, not more expensive.
See what MaintenanceCare can do for your team. Book a demo.